Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Hardeman v. Mendon Leasing Corp. 58 N.Y.2d 892

← Cases

Hardeman v. Mendon Leasing Corp.

58 N.Y.2d 892 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-02-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 892
Guss Hardeman, Respondent, v Mendon Leasing Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.
Decided February 15, 1983
p. 894
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Harry Organek and Howard S. Davis for appellant.
Norman Bard for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Joseph P. Sullivan at the Appellate Division ( 87 AD2d 232 ). We add that (1) subdivision 3 of section 388 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law expressly makes the liability of lessor and lessee joint and several, and (2) there was no due process violation because the lessor’s agent gave permission in fact and had the authority under Hendon’s contract with Midtown to refuse to do so.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Cases cited