Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Lind v. Lind 58 N.Y.2d 965

← Cases

Lind v. Lind

58 N.Y.2d 965 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-02-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 965
John K. Lind, Appellant, v Violet Lind, Respondent.
Argued February 16, 1983;
decided February 23, 1983
p. 967
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Irving I. Erdheim, Leonard C. Shalleck and Ralph S. Joseph for appellant.
Alan D. Scheinkman and Miriam M. Robinson for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

That court properly resolved the factual disputes before it in the causes of action for separation and divorce (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 NY2d 406 , 408) and it not appearing that that court abused its discretion or committed an error of law, its determinations of alimony, counsel fees and the use of the marital property are beyond our review (see Patron v Patron, 40 NY2d 582 , 585).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Cases cited