Hyperlawhypertext legal database Suburban Pontiac, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. 58 N.Y.2d 987

← Cases

Suburban Pontiac, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.

58 N.Y.2d 987 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-03-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 987
Suburban Pontiac, Inc., et al., Appellants, v General Motors Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Argued February 7, 1983;
decided March 22, 1983
p. 989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Michael J. Ricigliano, John F. Principe and David J. Sutton for appellants.
Guy Miller Struve, Mary Anne Wirth, D. Scott Wise and Peter D. Kolbrener for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. The factual determinations of the Appellate Division more nearly conform to the weight of the evidence, and there was no error of law in its declaration that General Motors had validly exercised its right to terminate the dealership agreement or in its decision that the complaint should otherwise be dismissed.

p. 990
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.