Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance 59 N.Y.2d 1021

← Cases

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

59 N.Y.2d 1021 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-07-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1021
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Respondent, v Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Appellant.
Decided July 7, 1983
p. 1023
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Norman H. Dachs for appellant.
A. Paul Goldblum for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 93 AD2d 814 ). This being an action between carriers for a declaratory judgment as to the division of responsibility between them, the reasoning of Chrysler Leasing Corp. v Public Administrator, N. Y. County ( 85 AD2d 410 ) is not apposite.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Cases cited