← Cases

In re the Claims of Di Martino

59 N.Y.2d 638 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-04-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 638
In the Matter of the Claims of Joseph Di Martino et al., Respondents. Buffalo Courier Express Co., Inc., Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of David L. Wells, Respondent. Utica Observer-Dispatch & Utica Daily Press,
p. 639
Inc., Appellant. Lillian Roberts, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.
Argued March 23, 1983;
decided April 28, 1983
p. 640
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Bonnie Glatzer and Fredric H. Fischer for Buffalo Courier Express, appellant.
William E. McKnight and Michael A. Hausknecht for Utica Observer-Dispatch & Utica Daily Press, Inc., appellant.
p. 641
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Paul S. Shemin, Peter H. Schiff and Iris A. Steel of counsel), for Philip Ross, Industrial Commissioner, respondent.
John D. Chestara for David L. Wells, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, in each of these cases.

Whether the relationships of the bundle-haulers and the motor route carriers with the publishers are those of employees or independent contractors involves resolution of questions of fact. We agree with the Appellate Division that in each case, taken as a whole the proof in the record constituted substantial evidence sustaining the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that the relationship was that of employer-employee.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-. ler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.

In each case: Order affirmed, with costs, in memorandum.