Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Coffey v. Joy 59 N.Y.2d 643

← Cases

Coffey v. Joy

59 N.Y.2d 643 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-04-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 643
In the Matter of John Coffey et al., Appellants, v Daniel W. Joy, as Commissioner of the Department of Housing Preservation and Development of the City of New York, Respondent.
Decided April 28, 1983
p. 644
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Howard C. Amron for appellants.
Harry Michaelson and Alan W. Ginsberg for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 91 AD2d 923 ).

p. 645
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons.

Cases cited