Hyperlawhypertext legal database Osterhout v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. 59 N.Y.2d 846

← Cases

Osterhout v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

59 N.Y.2d 846 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-06-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 846
Robert D. Osterhout et al., Appellants, v Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Respondent.
Decided June 9, 1983
p. 847
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Mahlon D. Clements for appellants.
Robert Small for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 91 AD2d 1172 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Simons.