Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Claim of Bauman v. Chili Furniture & Appliances, Inc. 59 N.Y.2d 859

← Cases

Claim of Bauman v. Chili Furniture & Appliances, Inc.

59 N.Y.2d 859 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-06-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 859
In the Matter of the Claim of John C. Bauman, Claimant, v Chili Furniture & Appliances, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Special Fund for Reopened Cases, Appellant. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.
Decided June 9, 1983
p. 861
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Patrick E. Harnedy for appellant.
John Clapper, III, for Chili Furniture & Appliances and another, respondents.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Morris N. Lissauer of counsel), for Workers’ Compensation Board, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board reinstated for reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice T. Paul Kane at the Appellate Division ( 92 AD2d 974 , 976).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

Cases cited