Majority
p. 582Shephard Melzer et al., Respondents, v Arthur Robbins et al., Appellants. Decided July 12, 1983
p. 583
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Michael Permut for appellants.
Joseph Di Benedetto for respondents.
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reason stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 92 AD2d 540 ; see, also, Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v Newburgh Dyeing Corp., 54 NY2d 715 ; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 ).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.
Cases cited
- Di Falco, Field & Lomenzo v. Newburgh Dyeing Corp. 54 NY2d 715 p. 583
- Zuckerman v. City of New York 49 NY2d 557 p. 583