Mead v. Bloom

60 N.Y.2d 926 Court N.Y. Decision date 1983-11-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 926

James J. Mead, Appellant-Respondent, v Karen E. Bloom et al., Defendants, and Hallman Adkins Chevrolet, Respondent-Appellant.

Submitted October 17, 1983;

decided November 23, 1983

p. 927

Motion to dismiss cross appeal taken by Hallman Adkins Chevrolet granted and said cross appeal dismissed, with costs and $20 costs of motion, upon the ground that cross-appellant is not aggrieved by the modification at the Appellate Division (CPLR 5601, subd [a], par [iii]).