Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Chmielewski v. City of New York 61 N.Y.2d 1010

← Cases

Chmielewski v. City of New York

61 N.Y.2d 1010 Court N.Y. Decision date 1984-03-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1010
In the Matter of Boleslaw Chmielewski, Respondent, v City of New York et al., Appellants. In the Matter of Boleslaw Chmielewski, Respondent, v Triboro Bridge and Tunnel Authority, Appellant.
Decided March 29, 1984
p. 1011
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel CMiriam Skolnick of counsel), for City of New York, appellant.
Lewis I. Wolf for Metropolitan Transportation Authority, appellant.
Stephen A. Weingrad for Triboro Bridge and Tunnel Authority, appellant.
William Greenberg for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court óf Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting petitioner’s application to serve late notices of claim.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.