Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Rodriguez v. Baker 61 N.Y.2d 804

← Cases

Rodriguez v. Baker

61 N.Y.2d 804 Court N.Y. Decision date 1984-02-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 804
Luz M. Rodriguez, Individually and as Mother and Natural Guardian of Alberto Miranda, an Infant, Respondent, v George P. Baker et al., Respondents, and Poirer & McLane Corporation and Raymond DiMenna Corporation, a Joint Venture, Appellants.
Argued January 10, 1984;
decided February 16, 1984
p. 806
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Patrick A. Lyons and Steven B. Prystowsky for appellants.
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel {Pamela Seider Dolgow and Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for City of New York, respondent.
Robert M. Ginsberg for plaintiff-respondent.
Thomas V. McMahon for George Baker and others, respondents, precluded.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Arnold L. Fein at the Appellate Division ( 91 AD2d 143 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Simons.

Cases cited