Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Litman v. Litman 61 N.Y.2d 918

← Cases

Litman v. Litman

61 N.Y.2d 918 Court N.Y. Decision date 1984-03-20 English

Contents

Majority

p. 918
Eugene Litman, Appellant, v Phyllis Litman, Respondent.
Argued February 17, 1984;
decided March 20, 1984
p. 919
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Kathy Solerwitz and Barbara Simon for appellant.
Kenneth J. Weinstein and Richard C. Goldberg for respondent.
p. 920
OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division ( 93 AD2d 695 ). We cannot say that the expert opinion with respect to the economic value of the plaintiff’s law practice would not be of assistance in fashioning a distributive award under the statute.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Cases cited