Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Sommer v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board 61 N.Y.2d 973

← Cases

Sommer v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

61 N.Y.2d 973 Court N.Y. Decision date 1984-03-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 973
In the Matter of Viola Sommer, Doing Business as ETE Co., Appellant, v New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board, Respondent.
Argued February 21, 1984;
decided March 22, 1984
p. 975
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Sherwin Belkin, Gary M. Rosenberg, Nicholas Kamillatos and Mitchell J. Baker for appellant.
Mary Ellen Cronly and Ellis S. Franke for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Max Bloom at the Appellate Division ( 93 AD2d 481 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Cases cited