Hyperlawhypertext legal database Bee Jay Industrial Corp. v. Fina 62 N.Y.2d 851

← Cases

Bee Jay Industrial Corp. v. Fina

62 N.Y.2d 851 Court N.Y. Decision date 1984-06-07 English

Judges Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Contents

Majority

p. 851
Bee Jay Industrial Corp., Appellant, v Charles Fina et al., Respondents.
Decided June 7, 1984
p. 853

Headnote

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard M. Gordon for appellant.
Harold J. McLaughlin for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 98 AD2d 738 ). We note that defendants’ motion for summary judgment was itself predicated on the absence of a written contract as required by the Statute of Frauds (General Obligations Law, § 5-703, subd 2).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Cases cited