Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Roginski v. Rose 63 N.Y.2d 735

← Cases

Roginski v. Rose

63 N.Y.2d 735 Court N.Y. Decision date 1984-09-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 735
In the Matter of John Roginski, Appellant, v Henry W. Rose, as Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Hempstead, et al., Respondents.
Decided September 13, 1984
p. 737
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
William S. Cohn for appellant.
W. Kenneth Chave, Jr., Town Attorney (.Denise Harvey Sher of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 97 AD2d 417 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Cases cited