Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Penfield Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Roberts 63 N.Y.2d 784

← Cases

Penfield Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. Roberts

63 N.Y.2d 784 Court N.Y. Decision date 1984-10-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 784
In the Matter of Penfield Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Respondent, v Lillian Roberts, Individually and as Commissioner of Labor, et al., Appellants. Rochester, New York Building and Construction Trades Council, Intervenor-Appellant.
Argued September 11, 1983;
decided October 9, 1984
p. 785
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General {John Q. Driscoll and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for appellants.
Bernard T. King for intervenor-appellant.
Thomas G. Dignan, Robb M. Jones and Michael A. Hausknecht for respondents.
p. 786
OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with- costs (Matter of Erie County Ind. Dev. Agency v Roberts, 63 NY2d 810 , decided herewith). Question certified not answered as unnecessary.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Cases cited