Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Goglia v. Sardino 64 N.Y.2d 1084

← Cases

Goglia v. Sardino

64 N.Y.2d 1084 Court N.Y. Decision date 1985-04-25 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1084
In the Matter of Thomas Goglia, Respondent, v Thomas J. Sardino, as Chief of Police of the City of Syracuse, et al., Appellants.
Argued March 26, 1985;
decided April 25, 1985
p. 1085
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
David M. Garber, Corporation Counsel (Robert J. Jenkins of counsel), for appellants.
John E. Butler for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in its memorandum decision (see, 101 AD2d 1013 ) and in the decision of Justice John W. Grow at Special Term ( 119 Misc 2d 907 ; see also, Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v Loudermill, 470 US_, 105 S Ct 1487 ).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Cases cited