← Cases

Adams Drug Co. v. Knobel

64 N.Y.2d 768 Court N.Y. Decision date 1985-01-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 768
Adams Drug Co., Inc., Appellant, v Franklin Knobel et al., Respondents.
Decided January 15, 1985
p. 770
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Earl Barrison for appellant.
J. Stanley Shaw and Jesse I. Levine for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and a new trial granted.

Under the fire clause of a lease providing that if more than 50% of the gross area of the building is destroyed by fire and reasonably cannot be restored to its preexisting condition within 120 days the landlord may, if he decides not to rebuild, terminate the lease, the landlord may not, though the other conditions be met, terminate the lease if he has in fact decided prior to termination to rebuild (Sabre Realty Mgt. Corp. v Vitale, 94 Misc 2d 1035 ; Bado Realty Co. v Oetjen, 5 Misc 2d 914 ). Because the Trial Judge erred in refusing to consider whether the landlord acted in good faith in giving notice of termination, there must be a new trial (Donohue v City of New York, 54 Misc 415 ; see, Matter of Noah’s Ark v Geib, 31 AD2d 866 , affg 56 Misc 2d 800 ).

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur in memorandum; Judge Alexander taking no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Cases cited