Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta City of Syracuse v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment 64 N.Y.2d 894

← Cases

City of Syracuse v. State Board of Equalization & Assessment

64 N.Y.2d 894 Court N.Y. Decision date 1985-03-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 894
In the Matter of the City of Syracuse et al., Appellants, v State Board of Equalization and Assessment, Respondent.
Argued February 4, 1985;
decided March 19, 1985
p. 895
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Marshall G. Kaplan, Andrew S. Fisher and Ellen M. Levanti for appellants.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (John Q. Driscoll and Robert Hermann of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. We affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 101 AD2d 653 ) and agree with that court that the method used in calculating the equalization rate was rational and the rate fixed was supported by substantial evidence.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander.

Cases cited