Hyperlawhypertext legal database City of New York v. New York State Board of Equalization & Assessment 65 N.Y. 656

← Cases

City of New York v. New York State Board of Equalization & Assessment

65 N.Y. 656 Court N.Y. Decision date 1985-05-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 656
In the Matter of City of New York, Appellant, v New York State Board of Equalization and Assessment, Respondent, and Donald N. David et al., Intervenors-Respondents.
Argued April 25, 1985;
decided May 28, 1985
p. 658
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Corporation Counsel (Reed G. Schneider, Gary Schuller and Joseph I. Lauer of counsel), for appellant.
William E. Banfield for Donald N. David, intervenor-respondent.
Mark S. Tulis, intervenor-respondent pro se.
Eugene J. Morris, intervenor-respondent pro se.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Albany County, with directions to remit to the Board for determination of whether the S/I notations are statutorily exempt from disclosure for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Howard A. Levine at the Appellate Division ( 102 AD2d 987 , 987-989).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander. Taking no part: Judge Titone.

Cases cited