Hyperlawhypertext legal database 61 Jane Street Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board 65 N.Y. 898

← Cases

61 Jane Street Associates v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Board

65 N.Y. 898 Court N.Y. Decision date 1985-07-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 898
In the Matter of 61 Jane Street Associates, Appellant, v New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board et al., Respondents.
Decided July 11, 1985
p. 899
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Richard F. Czaja for appellant.
Cullen S. McVoy for respondents.
p. 900
OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the determination of lawful rent was either arbitrary or capricious, or that the remedy imposed was disproportionate under the circumstances.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Titone. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.