Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Wilson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. 66 N.Y.2d 988

← Cases

Wilson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.

66 N.Y.2d 988 Court N.Y. Decision date 1985-12-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 988
Oswald Wilson, Appellant, v Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al., Respondents. (And Another Action.)
Decided December 19, 1985
p. 989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Kevin D. Moloney for appellant.
Thomas J. Mullaney for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 111 AD2d 807 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander and Titone.

Cases cited