Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta In re the Claim of Cohen 67 N.Y.2d 683

← Cases

In re the Claim of Cohen

67 N.Y.2d 683 Court N.Y. Decision date 1986-02-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 683
In the Matter of the Claim of Steven Cohen, Respondent. Blinder, Robinson & Company, Inc., Appellant; Lillian Roberts, as Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.
Decided February 6, 1986
p. 684
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Carl M. Kuntz for appellant.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Frederick M. Paola of counsel), for Lillian Roberts, as Commissioner of Labor, respondent.
William F. Reynolds for Steven Cohen, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 112 AD2d 687 ). We add only that unlike Matter of 12 Cornelia St. (Ross) ( 56 NY2d 895 ), the evidence here indicates the employer was able to exercise control over the activities of its salespersons beyond the requirements of applicable governmental regulation.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Cases cited