Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Bell v. Perrino 67 N.Y.2d 751

← Cases

Bell v. Perrino

67 N.Y.2d 751 Court N.Y. Decision date 1986-02-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 751
Arthur Bell, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Gurdian, Carole Bell, et al., Appellants, v Anthony R. Perrino et al., Respondents.
Decided February 19, 1986
p. 752
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Dorothy M. Finger for appellants.
Rocco Conte for City of New Rochelle, respondent.
George S. Hodges for Deluxe Radio Taxi, Inc., respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 112 AD2d 124 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.

Cases cited