Hyperlawhypertext legal database Holley v. Mandate Realty Corp. 69 N.Y.2d 721

← Cases

Holley v. Mandate Realty Corp.

69 N.Y.2d 721 Court N.Y. Decision date 1987-01-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 721
Vereese Holley, an Infant, by His Father, Cornelius Holley, et al., Respondents, v Mandate Realty Corp., Appellant.
Decided January 8, 1987
p. 723
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Nathan Cyperstein and Glen E. Kushel for appellant.
Martin Seinfeld for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 121 AD2d 202 ). Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye,

p. 724
Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr. Taking no part: Judge Bellacosa.

Cases cited