Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Whitney Museum of American Art v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal 73 N.Y.2d 938

← Cases

Whitney Museum of American Art v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

73 N.Y.2d 938 Court N.Y. Decision date 1989-03-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 938
In the Matter of Whitney Museum of American Art, Respondent, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Appellant, and Hilail Gilden et al., Intervenors-Appellants.
Argued February 7, 1989;
decided March 23, 1989
p. 940
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Sheldon D. Melnitsky and Dennis Hasher for appellant.
Donald Eng, David Rozenholc and Mitchell P. Heaney for Hilail Gilden and others, intervenors-appellants.
Kent Karlsson and William A. Herbert for Peter Dixjhoorn, intervenor-appellant.
Gary M. Rosenberg and Jeffrey Turkel for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 139 AD2d 444 ). Certified question answered in the affirmative.

p. 941
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, KLaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.