Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta People v. Simonds 73 N.Y.2d 945

← Cases

People v. Simonds

73 N.Y.2d 945 Court N.Y. Decision date 1989-03-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 945
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dean Simonds, Appellant.
Argued February 16, 1989;
decided March 23, 1989
p. 946
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Howard Friedman and Philip L. Weinstein for appellant.
Paul T. Gentile, District Attorney (Allen M. Hecht and Susan L. Valle of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. Defendant’s argument with respect to an alleged Rosario (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286 ) violation,

p. 947
never having been raised in the trial court or the Appellate Division, is unpreserved for our review (People v Poole, 48 NY2d 144 , 149-150), and his other arguments are without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Cases cited