Hyperlawhypertext legal database Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 74 N.Y.2d 836

← Cases

Carl Redcross v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

74 N.Y.2d 836 Court N.Y. Decision date 1989-09-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 836
Carl Redcross et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of Travis Redcross, an Infant, Appellants, v Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Respondent, and Miriam Solomon et al., Appellants.
Submitted June 10, 19, 1989;
decided September 19, 1989

Motion [by defendants-appellants] for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion [by plaintiffs] for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to show that the order sought to be appealed from is final as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iv) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iv]).