Majority
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. We agree with the Appellate Division that "[w]here, as here, the policy is ambiguous, and no extrinsic evidence [was] offered from which the jury could conclude that the policy should be interpreted in favor of the insurer, [the direction of] a verdict in favor of the insured [was warranted]” (Tri Town Antlers Found. v Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 158 AD2d 908 ,909; see, Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v Wesolowski, 33 NY2d 169 , 172; City of Albany v Standard Acc. Ins. Co., 7 NY2d 422 , 430).
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Cases cited
- Tri Town Antlers Foundation, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance 158 AD2d 908 at 909 p. 842
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Wesolowski 33 NY2d 169 at 172 p. 842
- City of Albany v. Standard Accident Insurance 7 NY2d 422 at 430 p. 842