Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Crook v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co. 81 N.Y.2d 807

← Cases

Crook v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours Co.

81 N.Y.2d 807 Court N.Y. Decision date 1993-02-16 English

Contents

Majority

p. 807
Cheryl Crook et al., Appellants, v E. I. du Pont de Nemours Company et al., Defendants, and National Chemsearch, Division of N.C.H. Corp., et al., Respondents.
Argued January 13, 1993;
decided February 16, 1993
p. 809
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Andrew F. Plasse, Fayetteville, for appellants.
Saperston & Day, P. C, Buffalo (Catherine Habermehl of counsel), for National Chemsearch, Division of N.C.H. Corp., respondent.
Falk & Siemer, Buffalo (J. Joseph Wilder and Michael P. McClaren of counsel), for Hotsy Corporation, respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 181 AD2d 1039 ).

Concur: Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Ti-

p. 810
tone, Bellacosa and Smith. Taking no part: Judge Hancock, Jr.