Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Bloom v. Crosson 82 N.Y.2d 768

← Cases

Bloom v. Crosson

82 N.Y.2d 768 Court N.Y. Decision date 1993-10-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 768
[624 NE2d 175, 603 NYS2d 991]
Bernard M. Bloom, as Kings County Surrogate, et al., Appellants, v Matthew T. Crosson, as Chief Administrator of the Courts of the State of New York, Respondent, et al., Defendant.
Argued September 2, 1993;
decided October 7, 1993
p. 770
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Cahn Wishod Wishod & Lamb, Melville (Richard C. Cahn, Eugene L. Wishod, Scott M. Karson, Frederick Eisenbud and Howard M. Miller of counsel), for appellants.
Michael Colodner, New York City, and John Eiseman, Stephen E. Gross, Lawrence K. Marks and Kenneth Falk for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered

p. 771
in the negative for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice A. Franklin Mahoney at the Appellate Division ( 183 AD2d 341 ).

Concur: Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith. Taking no part: Chief Judge Kaye and Judge Levine.

Cases cited