Majority
p. 886In the Matter of Richard Daum et al., Appellants, v Pauline Young et al., Respondents. Submitted November 1, 1993; decided December 21, 1993
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed so much of Family Court’s order as denied petitioners’ application to hold respondents in contempt, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.