Majority
p. 1027In the Matter of Thomas Chisholm, Appellant, v Frank E. Irvin, as Superintendent of Wende Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents. Submitted April 3, 1995; decided June 15, 1995
p. 1028
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the movant has failed to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iii]).