Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta People v. Gutierez 86 N.Y.2d 817

← Cases

People v. Gutierez

86 N.Y.2d 817 Court N.Y. Decision date 1995-09-19 English

Contents

Majority

p. 817
[657 NE2d 491, 633 NYS2d 470]
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Blas Gutierez, Appellant.
Decided September 19, 1995
p. 818
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Jeffrey A. Udell, New York City, Richard M. Greenberg, and E. Joshua Rosenkranz for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Lisa H. Blitman of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered. Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. On appeal, defendant challenges the court’s closure of the trial to the public during the undercover officer’s testimony. The trial court erred in excluding defendant’s family members from the courtroom. The record indicates that the trial court’s closure of the courtroom excluding defendant’s close family members was broader than constitutionally tolerable and, thus, constituted a violation of defendant’s overriding right to a public trial (see, People v Martinez, 82 NY2d 436 , 444; People v Kin Kan, 78 NY2d 54 , 58; see also, Vidal v Williams, 31 F3d 67 , 69). Although the undercover officer indicated that he feared his life and ongoing drug investigations would be jeopardized, he never claimed to hold those fears with respect to defendant’s wife and children and did not otherwise advance any valid ground for excluding defendant’s family during the officer’s testimony.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Cases cited