Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Domash v. Standard Coat, Apron & Linen Service 9 N.Y.2d 889

← Cases

Domash v. Standard Coat, Apron & Linen Service

9 N.Y.2d 889 Court N.Y. Decision date 1961-04-27 English

Contents

Majority

p. 889
In the Matter of the Claim of Ethel Domash, Respondent, v. Standard Coat, Apron and Linen Service et al., Appellants, and Special Funds Conservation Committee, Respondent. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued April 18, 1961;
decided April 27, 1961.
p. 890
Bernard F. Farley for appellants.
Louis J. Lefhowits, Attorney-General (Daniel Polanshy, Paxton Blair and Boy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent.
John M. Cullen for Special Funds Conservation Committee, respondent.
Abraham Marhhoff for claimant-respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

p. 891
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Ftjld, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that it is not based on any accident within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.