Hyperlawhypertext legal database Schwartz v. Colorfilm, Inc. 9 N.Y.2d 969

← Cases

Schwartz v. Colorfilm, Inc.

9 N.Y.2d 969 Court N.Y. Decision date 1961-05-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 969
Irving M. Schwartz, Doing Business as Acme Trading Company, Appellant, v. Colorfilm, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.
Submitted May 15, 1961;
decided May 18, 1961.

Headnote

Reported below, 12 A D 2d 899 .
Richard Lieb and Evalyn Lipton for motion.
James E. Mathias opposed.
p. 970
Motion denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements, upon the ground that the determination sought to be reviewed involves a pure question of discretion of the type not reviewable by the Court of Appeals (Trapani v. Samuels, 3 N Y 2d 931 ).