Hyperlawhypertext legal database Scharkopf v. Cadbury Schweppes, Inc. 91 N.Y.2d 1001

← Cases

Scharkopf v. Cadbury Schweppes, Inc.

91 N.Y.2d 1001 Court N.Y. Decision date 1998-05-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1001
Kevin Scharkopf et al., Appellants, v Cadbury Schweppes, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Canada Dry Corporation et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Foster Forbes Division-American National Can Company, Doing Business as Southdown Deli, et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents.
Submitted March 9, 1998;
decided May 14, 1998
p. 1002
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as dismissed the appeal from Supreme Court’s order denying appellant’s motion to reargue, dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.