Momah v. Rogers — 93 N.Y.2d 864

Majority

p. 864

[711 NE2d 198, 689 NYS2d 13]

In the Matter of Charles M. Momah, Appellant, v Kathleen M. Rogers, as St. Lawrence County Judge, et al., Respondents.

Argued February 9, 1999;

decided March 25, 1999

p. 867

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

Goldman & Hafetz, New York City (Lawrence S. Goldman and Elizabeth M. Johnson of counsel), for appellant.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, Syracuse (Norman S. Hatt, Arthur G. Weinstein and Lawrence N. Gray of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Judgment affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Paul J. Yesawich, Jr., at the Appellate Division ( 239 AD2d 20 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.