Sutherland v. City of New York — 95 N.Y.2d 790

Majority

p. 790

Norrel Sutherland, Appellant, v City of New York et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants. Ingersoll-Rand Company, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v Pile Foundation Construction Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 1.) Norrel Sutherland, Appellant, v Pile Foundation Construction Co., Inc., Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Submitted March 20, 2000;

decided May 18, 2000

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal with respect to defendants Pile Foundation Construction Co., Inc., the City of New York, the Department of Sanitation of the City of New York, and the Department of Business Services of the City of New York, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remaining portion of the Appellate Division order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine an action within the meaning of the Constitution.