Hyperlawhypertext legal database Laur & Mack Contracting Co. v. Di Cienzo 96 N.Y.2d 895

← Cases

Laur & Mack Contracting Co. v. Di Cienzo

96 N.Y.2d 895 Court N.Y. Decision date 2001-07-10 English

Contents

Majority

p. 895
Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Appellant, v Dino Di Cienzo, Sr., et al., Respondents. Laur & Mack Contracting Co., Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v Russell Associates, Also Known as Office of Edward D. Russell, Architect, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
Submitted May 29, 2001;
decided July 10, 2001

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal as against Russell Associates, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.