Majority
p. 749Gerald Goldman et al., Appellants, v Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP et al., Respondents. Submitted June 16, 2008; decided September 4, 2008
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the denial of appellants’ motions for leave to amend the complaint and for renewal, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.