Sital v. City of New York — 13 N.Y.3d 903

Majority

p. 903

Keiwan Sital, Respondent, v City of New York, Appellant.

Submitted October 5, 2009;

decided December 17, 2009

Headnote

Reported below, 60 AD3d 465 .

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Whitfield v City of New York, 90 NY2d 777 , 780-781 [1997]).

Cases cited

Sital v. City of New York 60 AD3d 465 N.Y. App. Div. 2009-03-10 p. 903
Whitfield v. City of New York 90 NY2d 777 N.Y. 1997-12-02 at 780-781 p. 903