← Cases

DeJesus v. Alba

14 N.Y.3d 860 Court N.Y. Decision date 2010-05-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 860
[928 NE2d 409, 902 NYS2d 27]
Diomara DeJesus, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, Francisco DeJesus, Appellant, v Jose J. Alba et al., Respondents.
Decided May 6, 2010
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Seligson, Rothman & Rothman, New York City (Martin S. Rothman of counsel), for appellant.
p. 861
Picciano & Scahill, P.C., Westbury (Gilbert J. Hardy of counsel), for respondents.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division properly concluded that no triable issues of fact existed whether defendant driver acted prudently under the circumstances.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.