← Cases

Bronson v. Hansel

16 N.Y.3d 850 Court N.Y. Decision date 2011-04-28 English

Contents

Majority

p. 850
[947 NE2d 157, 922 NYS2d 266]
Trudi L. Bronson, Appellant, v Allen J. Hansel, Respondent.
Decided April 28, 2011
p. 851
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Cellino & Barnes, P.C., Buffalo (Gregory V. Pajak and Ellen B. Sturm of counsel), for appellant.
Brown & Kelly, LLP, Buffalo (Patricia S. Ciccarelli of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed with costs.

In support of his motion for summary judgment, defendant proffered a prima facie case that the action should be barred on the ground of release. In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the release should be set aside on the ground of mutual mistake (see Mangini v McClurg, 24 NY2d 556 , 563-566 [1969]) or because the settlement was not “fairly and knowingly made” (Farrington v Harlem Sav. Bank, 280 NY 1 , 4 [1939]).

p. 852
Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Cases cited