← Cases

Henderson v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

16 N.Y.3d 886 Court N.Y. Decision date 2011-05-10 English

Contents

Majority

p. 886
[948 NE2d 923, 924 NYS2d 317]
Joyce Henderson, Respondent, v Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.
Decided May 10, 2011
p. 887
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Office of Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellants.
Lipsig Shapey Manus & Moverman, P.C., New York City (Jillian Rosen of counsel), and Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York City (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Appellants failed to comply with the conditional or

p. 888
der. Therefore, the courts below did not err in striking appellants’ answer.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.