Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc. 17 N.Y.3d 908

← Cases

Claim of Parkhurst v. United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc.

17 N.Y.3d 908 Court N.Y. Decision date 2011-11-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 908
[958 NE2d 119, 934 NYS2d 85]
In the Matter of the Claim of Bob Parkhurst, Claimant, v United Rentals Aerial Equipment, Inc., et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim of James Arthur Robinson, Claimant, v Gould Pumps ITT et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.
Argued October 18, 2011;
decided November 15, 2011
p. 909
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Buckner & Kourofsky, LLP, Rochester (Jacklyn M. Penna of counsel), for appellants.
Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Steven C. Wu, Barbara D. Underwood and Benjamin N. Gutman of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs (see Matter of Raynor v Landmark Chrysler, 18 NY3d 48 [2011] [decided today]).

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.

Cases cited