Singer v. Krul — 18 N.Y.3d 953

Majority

p. 953

Daniel Singer, Appellant, v Casey Krul, Respondent.

Submitted February 6, 2012;

decided March 29, 2012

Headnote

Reported below, 90 AD3d 1378 .

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Cuadrado v New York City Tr. Auth., 65 AD3d 434 [2009], Iv dismissed 14 NY3d 748 [2010]).

Cases cited

Singer v. Krul 90 AD3d 1378 N.Y. App. Div. 2011-12-22 p. 953
Cuadrado v. New York City Transit Authority 65 AD3d 434 N.Y. App. Div. 2009-08-11 p. 953