Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Settenbrino v. Barroga-Hayes 18 N.Y.3d 954

← Cases

Settenbrino v. Barroga-Hayes

18 N.Y.3d 954 Court N.Y. Decision date 2012-03-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 954
In the Matter of Susan D. Settenbrino, P.C., Appellant, v Florentina Barroga-Hayes, Respondent.
Submitted January 17, 2012;
decided March 29, 2012

Headnote

Reported below, 89 AD3d 1094 .

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Supreme Court’s order denying petitioner’s motion to correct the judgment, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Cases cited