Hyperlawhypertext legal database Young v. Fruci 22 N.Y.3d 1037

← Cases

Young v. Fruci

22 N.Y.3d 1037 Court N.Y. Decision date 2013-12-31 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1037
In the Matter of Cynthia Young, Appellant, v William Fruci et al., Respondents, and Paul J. Sausville, Respondent.
Submitted December 30, 2013;
decided December 31, 2013

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284 , 297-298 [1929, Cardozo, Ch. J.]).

Cases cited